Russians repeating Bolton's nonsense
This article turned up yesterday.
I have written extensively about Russian abuse of international law - where they parrot Bolton, Rumsfeld and American hawk legal nihilism.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4f7b/b4f7b2d960442e34f1778ac1548d994fade5255f" alt=""
This is what I wrote previously in case you missed it:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efdae/efdaeecda874459985a1e234d1055ad394b3e5d8" alt=""
Look, the evil DNR and LNR courts used the bullshit illegal combatant/mercenary designation to ‘sentence’ Westerners to death. This is not law. Don’t be a Russian. Even if Aiden was a mercenary (he very very much wasn't) then he would have rights as a civilian under art. 47. In Ukraine a mercenary, the Wagner type, not Aiden, is a criminal and still has rights:
The subject of Russian trials for Westerners, in Azov or not, is covered in our upcoming book. I wrote the appropriate section quite a while ago.1 Its terrifying that my predictions are correct.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/534f3/534f3e32c2a8ddf38e6668dee2c99fb0beb16e57" alt=""
I quote Silvia Borelli, ‘Casting Light on the Legal Black Hole: International Law and Detentions Abroad in the “War on Terror.”’, International Review of the Red Cross 87, no. 857 (2005): 39–68, https://doi.org/10.1017/s1816383100181184 and John R. Bolton, ‘The Risks and the Weaknesses of the International Criminal Court from America’s Perspective’, The International Criminal Court, 2017, 459–76, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351146401-18. ↩